the analysis becomes engaged in the path of transference
– and for us it is the index that this has taken place [1]
This paper is part of a research project called “Indexing Architecture” that explores key issues on the displacement of architecture from analogue to digital landscapes. The way in which architecture is archived and exhibited has nowadays changed and the continuous emergence of numerous virtual museums and indexes is indicative of the role that digital technologies have on this peculiar displacement. This transmedia transference, however, is easier said than understood. The lacanic conception of the index proposes a possible pathway to conceive the displacement of architecture in post-digital humanities: a humanistic approach to the subject of codifying and displaying architecture and a similar humanistic understanding of web 3.0 leads on to this paper’s argument that digital indexes are in fact configurations with peculiar cognitive value. According to Bill Hillier [2], configuration is defined not simply as connections, but as relations that take into account other relations. At one level, this implies that positioning architecture in post-digital humanities is not at all about building the chronological infrastructure in the study of projects through digital repositories. Neoanalogue forms of indexing architecture do not limit media technology to static snapshots of buildings and public spaces; but instead try to expand the dynamics of the archive as to include the sets of interaction and interrelations produced by the medium specificity itself. In this paper, I explore a tentative path for the displacement to occur: by defining the idea of exhibiting architecture through web 3.0 not as a static repository but as a platform for interactive narratives of cognitive capacity, the main intention is to bring forth those user/machine relations that need other relations in order to become communicative. Moreover, I propose to expand its lacanic limits from something that simply allows us to arrange the individual parts that furnish the signifiers of a presentation, to a tool for the translation of the parts into elements and features with interrelated meaning –being the latter a traditional concern of the humanities. This approach draws from a recent work in digital indexes of architecture in the light of their humanistic engagements with media technologies. DomesIndex [3] , the first major effort to exhibit the contemporary Greek architecture in a narrative mode of tracing objects’ fragmented connections with their formative context, is reviewed as a tool for mapping controversies both within its exhibited projects and through their network of information.
Keywords: indexes, postdigital humanities, cognition, neoanalogue
[1] Lacan. (2001). Ecrits: A Selection: Taylor & Francis. p.64.
[2] The term configuration is central to the syntactic conception of space as developed by Bill Hillier. It is used here in an analogical way, considering the Index as adopting a similar complex system of relations as the physical space itself. For more, see Hillier. (1998). Space is the Machine.
[3] Manis, Panetsos and Papadopoulos. (2012). DOMES INDEX 2014, from
http://domesindex.com